Featured Post DOWNLOAD FREE EBOOK ! The Truth is FREE

Black Panther Disney agenda and the Cape to Cairo program

Black Panther the Africa Agenda trigger - From the frying pan into the fire- Plot thickens We all know that art imitates life imitates ar...

Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Heel Pricks Newborn Babies and Genetic Privacy violated In SA, NWReligion

 Heel Pricks Newborn Babies and Genetic Privacy violated In SA

 Image result for babies

DNA screening is illegal when you are an adult but can be done when you are a newborn infant, genetic experimentation and researches that boost State Health Government or contractor involvement.
This has been implemented as a law in other countries,
Screening is new born genetic testing and profiling the individual, the DNA is being used but for the first 6 months the blood is no more useful except for the value of the DNA, sequencing of the entire genetic blueprint of the child
SA Potchefstroom
" In addition, the PLIEM laboratory may facilitate in prenatal testing and testing of siblings of the index patient. The economic implication of prenatal and sibling testing depends on the family structure and financial abilities of the parents. Each case is unique and limited costs will be applied to ultimately support families in uncertain times. PLIEM also collaborates with various metabolic and genetic laboratories in Europe and America to provide additional specialised diagnostic tests at no or minimal costs (depending on the selection of tests for a specific
disorder).  While providing a vital, one-of-a-kind testing service in South Africa, the laboratory also – with the informed consent of parents – uses residual blood samples for further research on inherited metabolic disorders. The greater the knowledge base about these disorders in South Africa, the greater the prospect of assisting generations not yet born
PLIEM -We are offering this test as of 1 Augustus 2014. At the moment samples are sent to a laboratory in the USA, and from July 2015 this test will be conducted in our own laboratory.

Baby DNA considered National Treasure
"This nationwide collection of newborn DNA has been called a "national treasure" by Sharon Terry of the Genetic Alliance and referred to at the December 2009 forum as a "scientific goldmine" by Amy Gaviglio, a genetic counselor at the Minnesota Department of Health.

Increasingly, state health departments have begun to store newborn blood spots (Baby DNA) and newborn genetic test results and claim them as state government property. The test results are placed in a state laboratory database (genetic registry) and the blood spots are warehoused in the state health department or elsewhere by contract. For instance, the 4.2 million blood spots of Texas newborns were being stored at Texas A&M. 
In Minnesota, there are more than 1.5 million children listed with their genetic test results in the state's database. There are over 900,000 Minnesota children whose DNA is warehoused by the State with at least 70,000 children added per year.

The primary purpose for long-term storage of baby DNA and newborn genetic test results is research.


Newborn Genetic Screening Mandate

Every state has a mandatory newborn screening program to test for serious genetic disorders and genetic traits in newborns. Within 48 hours after the birth of a baby, the heel is pricked, newborn blood is squeezed onto a card with special filter paper, and the card is sent for analysis to the State government laboratory or the laboratory under contract with the State Department of Health. At least 4.0 million newborn babies are tested every year in the United States.

Parents are not asked before the newborn genetic testing is done. Most states mandate the testing. No consent is required. Some states allow parents to opt out of testing, particularly for religious reasons. However, parents are not usually informed that opting out is possible. In fact, most parents have no idea that the testing is even being done.
However, if they were given a choice, most parents would likely choose to have their child tested to speed up the diagnosis and treatment of these relatively rare newborn disorders.

This affirmation of newborn screening may change in the future as newborn screening advocates contemplate testing the baby's genome for childhood- or adult-onset diseases. One of the future concerns with newborn screening, as noted in 2008 by the President's Council on Bioethics (The Changing Moral Focus of Newborn Screening) and by Citizens' Council on Health Care, is the potential slide to eugenics.
If parents feel concerns about how their child's genetic test results may impact their children, their own choices, or their children's options in employment, insurance, or procreation, parents may begin to avoid testing or try to limit the number of conditions for which their child is tested. Already, some States mandate newborn genetic testing for a shorter list of conditions and allow parents to opt-out of testing for a secondary more controversial list of genetic conditions.
The screening of the baby provides insight into the genetic traits of the mother of the child, as described by Dr. Piero Rinaldo, M.D., director of the Mayo laboratory, at a forum on the use of residual (left-over) newborn dried blood spots ("Bloodspots, Genetic Research and Privacy" September 23, 2009 forum):
There’s actually an interesting collateral effect of newborn screening. More and more of the conditions that we screen for, now we’ve found that abnormal results in a baby is actually because the mother is affected....I think this could become an angle where we can actually bring to the attention of obstetricians that [it] is also their problem because sometimes newborn screening diagnoses not an affected child, but an affected mother. And it’s the mother who does have a condition that may or may not be symptomatic.
Dr. Alan Fleischman, MD, Medical Director of the March of Dimes, stated at the September 2009 forum the following basis for the state's authority to mandate the genetic testing of children:

YOur Rights
You have the right to take back the blood sample
you al;so have the right to do this in private
The Government has no right to store your DNA in a BIO Bank for Further Research without your consent

Stay Vigilant !

Wednesday, January 17, 2018


Due to the Dire weather conditions such as drought and the global apocalyptic agenda, there has been some direct hits in the FOLLOWING WAYS

from the recorded reports on 26 October 2017 Health24

 reported on the plague outbreak in Madagascar. This caused quite a stir and made us wonder what other plagues and diseases have the potential to cause mayhem in South Africa.
Several infectious diseases from the past, such as the Black Death, were encouraged by factors such as climate change, unsanitary conditions and migration between continents. But what exactly are the conditions that would favour a disease outbreak in South Africa?
Current drought situation 
With the drought situation in the Western Cape, there are risk factors that may lead to outbreaks of certain diseases. “The present drought and related severe water restrictions open up a pathway for the transmission of infections that may be difficult to manage should these restrictions continue for a long time,” says Dr Jo Barnes from the Department of Global Health at Stellenbosch University.
These diseases also have the tendency to get out of control and spread to other areas.
Clean water and the safe disposal of faeces and perishable foods are needed to avoid the outbreak of waterborne disease in any community.
“The factors that are the most important in determining outbreaks of communicable diseases are the quality and quantity of the water supply in a community, the sanitation facilities and standards, the quality and cleanliness of food, the climate and  the vulnerabilities of the population in that area,” says Dr Barnes.

When do these diseases spread?
We have large numbers of poor people, people who do not have enough to eat and who suffer from chronic diseases, particularly conditions like HIV/Aids that compromise the immune system.
Once an infectious disease takes hold in a population living in poor conditions, the spread of that disease can be quite rapid. Another factor when considering the risks to people living under severe drought conditions is the capacity of health services to cope.
What about health services?
This is a big concern as our health services are already under serious strain. When health services are overwhelmed, diseases are able to spread unchecked. This aspect needs serious consideration, but as the area is already in the grip of a drought, it is too late to improve present access to health services. Such actions require proper planning, time and money.
So which diseases are the biggest threat?
“The most important and probably first type of outbreak that can occur most likely involves the waterborne diarrhoeal diseases. Typhoid fever is one such an example. At present the Western Cape does not have indigenous cholera but that may change, depending on environmental, climatic and human factors,” says Dr Barnes. Let’s take a look at some of these diseases that are bound to hit South Africa if drought and unsanitary conditions persist.
1. Giardiasis
Giardiasis, popularly revered to as “beaver fever”, is a parasitic disease caused by Giardia lamblia. While it’s possible that the disease can live in some people without presenting any symptoms, the symptoms are largely abdominal cramps, diarrhoea, nausea and fatigue. These symptoms typically last for two weeks and can be treated, but like any infection of the digestive system, giardiasis can be dangerous especially in those with impaired immune systems.
giardiasis bacteria
2. Typhoid fever
Typhoid fever is caused by the bacteria Salmonella typhi and is transferred between humans. Typhoid can spread quickly and can be fatal if not treated immediately. Typhoid is a risk especially in developing countries and countries experiencing drought. The two most prominent symptoms are high fever and a rash. Other symptoms include abdominal pain and headaches.
3. Hepatitis A
Hepatitis A is an infection of the liver cells. As the body’s immune system tries to fight the virus, the response by the immune system causes liver cell damage and inflammation. According to the World Health Organization, hepatitis A occurs sporadically and often results in epidemics worldwide, and has a tendency to reoccur. Hepatitis A is spread through contaminated food and water.
While hepatitis A doesn’t cause chronic liver failure like hepatitis B and C, it can still cause acute liver failure, which is often fatal. Symptoms can range from mild to severe and can include fever, fatigue, diarrhoea, vomiting and jaundice (yellow skin).
hepatitis a
4. Amoebic dysentery
Amoebic dysentery is an infection of the intestines caused by Entamoeba hystolitica. These can attach themselves to the gut lining and spread via the intestinal wall to other organs.
Amoebic dysentery mostly stays inside the intestines and causes bloody diarrhoea, vomiting, nausea and stomach cramps. While the symptoms can be treated and disappear after a couple of days, amoebic dysentery can be fatal if dehydration occurs, especially in those with compromised immune systems. Complications of dysentery can be severe.
5. West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne virus that is transmitted to horses and humans through mosquito bites. WNV has occured in South Africa before – the largest outbreak among humans was in the Karoo in 1974, with another outbreak following in the Witwatersrand area in the 1980s.
A study lead by researchers in the USA has found that drought increases the severity of WNV in the USA – a pattern of drought was the dominant weather pattern correlated with the size of a WNV epidemic, researchers say.
Symptoms include feelings of severe illness – a high fever, headache, stiff neck, disorientation, muscle weakness, numbness and paralysis.


Lyme and West Nile Are Bioterror Agents – Rockefeller Implicated

Ref Article : Cas Ingram
 Lyme and West Nile Are Bioterror Agents – Rockefeller Implicated

No doubt, the occurrence of potentially deadly and body-devastating insect-borne diseases, Lyme and West Nile, is associated with human corruption. Both these diseases developed at the height of US bioterrorism research or shall it be said research on the use of microbes as a means to kill humans and other creatures.

  • Evidence points to the fact that the potentially deadly Lyme disease, as well as the potentially fatal West Nile virus, being rather than naturally evolving diseases are actual bioterrorism agents.
  •  This means they are fully biological agents, artificially grown, cultured, and produced for purposes of spreading great corruption in the land. It also means that their spread and the diseases they cause are artificial, though the consequences are very real, indeed.
Whoever is responsible for such corruption, for the spread of such tyranny, must be thoroughly exposed.
  • All evidence points to the Rockefeller clique and their collaborators as the source.
The suffering caused by Lyme, as well as West Nile, is great, both to human beings and the animal kingdom. The spread of these diseases has effectively disabled much of humankind, while killing either through slow, writhing death or relatively sudden death, thousands of individuals.
Rockefeller holds himself up as if a divine being. Self-righteously, he deems himself a kind of savior, of the human race, the environment, and the animal kingdom. How absolutely pathological, how terminally corrupt, could anyone be? David Rockefeller is achieving the precise opposite of his boisterous claims.
He is a wretched beyond any description, treacherous to the extreme. Make no mistake about it he has deemed himself sufficiently high as if to create life, that is in the form of recombinant biological agents, while also facilitating death – through great acts of treachery such as the creation and release of these man-altered biological agents, also through the production and dissemination of recombinant, murderous vaccines.
Whether the clique intended to wholesale kill innocents in regard to the release of these deadly diseases or whether it was a mere experimental blunder is unknown. Malicious dissemination is plausible. So is accidental release. Even so, there has been purposeful, planned release of human- manipulated germs in the past been malicious and purposeful, as has occurred with US military research, for instance the spraying of populated areas in the 1950s with Serratia marcesans, resulting in some 11 deaths in San Francisco Bay area alone.
In fact, by his own words it is plausible that it could be purposeful:





  US Congressional Department of Defense Appropriations Committee for 1970:
The screen-capture is placed to capture the name of the Defense Department private agent, Dr. Donald MacArthur, who was acting coordinator for privately established biological weapons research. Said MacArthur in response to queries about the creation of so-called synthetic biological warfare agents:The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
  • A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
  • All biological agents up the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purpose.
  • Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
The creation of from base genetics new, novel types of germs, which are infective and which can readily cause human disease: by plotting and scheming against the human race? Yet, this is precisely what ultimately occurred with both Lyme and West Nile, as well as AIDS: the infection of humans, as well as animals, by germs which the immune system fails to recognize and in which drug therapy is relatively impotent.
MacArthur’s request was approved and the money was allocated, therefore, existing “representatives of naturally occurring disease” agents were studied and surely manipulated. A mere coincidence? Lyme broke out in this time period, some five to six years after the initiation of this research. Too, this was at the time when the Kissinger-coordinated depopulation memorandum was released, specifically in the summer of 1974, a mere year or less from the Borrelia spirochete outbreak in Lyme/Old Lyme, Connecticut. The Kissinger, actually, Rockefeller document was implemented less than a year later, yes, indeed in that fateful year of the full-bore Lyme outbreak, 1975, when Bilderberger Gerald Ford signed into action the so-called National Security Defense Memorandum, no. 314. The United States of Corruption signed in Kissinger’s depopulation plot.
None of this can be a coincidence. Surely, both Lyme and West Nile, among numerous others, are biological weapons. Merely consider it. Rockefeller agents, which rule over the US government, impose a so-called defense budget of some 10 million dollars, 1970, to create biological agents that could readily either kill or disable humans.
Did some of that money, then, get appropriated to Plum Island bioweapons research center? It surely did, and look at the consequences:

 **Make no mistake about it like West Nile Lyme, too, is man-made. Notes Carroll in his book Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government’s Secret Plum Island Germ Laboratory:
“The focal point of experimentation on Plum Island in the 1970s, the Lone Star tick-like Lyme disease, is now spread throughout New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut…a 1978 internal research document from the Department of Agriculture” stating, essentially, that “Plum Island was experimenting with the Lone Star tick, feeding them on viruses and testing them on pigs, during the ground zero year of Lyme disease…they might have transmitted (Lyme disease) to researchers or the island’s (animals).”
The Texas tick is completely foreign to the region, only occurring in Texas. Now, it is found throughout the northeast, exclusively a consequence of its release, purposeful or otherwise, from the island.
Thus, clearly, the killer diseases West Nile virus infection and Lyme spirochete infestation are rather than natural occurrences man-made corruptions. There can be no doubt that the primary force behind the creation of these manipulated germs is the cabal headed by David Rockefeller. It is he and his collaborators who are responsible for the destruction and devastation caused by these diseases more than any others.
It is horror that the Rockefeller clique has created: to the extreme. What vast harm has he caused by his countless trillions being used as a weapon against the people? How many lives has he ruined as a result of the biological agent research he endorsed? He should be exposed to the universe and beyond for this, brought down on charges, fully exposed for what he is. That is a mass murderer of innocents and a destroyer of civilization, of the common people, of the animals, and of the planet earth itself.
The diseases themselves are ever so difficult to deal with, Lyme especially. It is a monstrous element, and it takes a monumental effort to eradicate it after it becomes established in the body. The fact is the pathogen behaves just as MacNamara predicted, being fully “refractory” to all that the immune system attempts to do to eradicate it, being virtually immune to all that exists, including drugs, “upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”
Through his deceit and his criminally acquired billions Rockefeller has done the untenable. He has taken away the freedoms of the people, even the freedom of having the kind of chance, the opportunity – the natural immunity – to combat and cure the onslaught of dangerous infectious diseases.
The Rockefellers and their collaborators have created a monstrous public health issue, which is causing untold pain and agony, as well as premature death, among the people. Then, that same clique offers the answers in the form of drug therapy and recombinant vaccines, as well as the spraying of entire cities and regions with carcinogenic pesticides. Yet, the only answer for reversing and gaining self-protection is the powers of nature, at which Rockefeller himself is at war (see the book, The Lyme Disease Cure, same author, Knowledge House Publishers).
Diamond, M. S., ed. West Nile Encephalitis Virus Infection: Viral Pathogenesis and the Host Immune Response.


Because we are Rich in Minerals but we disrespect it,

Because we kill our source of Food, our land and sell out our souls for Nuclear instead of going organic and working with the land.

Because We are gullible and naive and trust all Outsiders who wave money bills at us, we freely  give up our HUMAN RIGHTS as long We don't have to work or change our minds and hearts,Its easy to stay in the past and to stay a victim.

Because, while we are busy squabbling about Racism and who becomes the next president , "THEY"- THE ARCHITECTS OF THE AGENDA, Not this Race or that Race, they are collected Body of Rich Business Men are ripping our country to peaces, sell our children on the open market, exploit our Minds with feeble free internet and free technology promises, and feed us their GMO FOODS BY TAKING OUR SEEDS,LAND AND SEA FROM US, LEAVING US WITH NOTHING IN THE END, BECAUSE WE ARE DIVIDED NOT UNITED


  • Start your own veggie garden, go organic

  • Say no to interference

  • Connect within your community, there is strength in numbers

  • Support each other

  • Grow up, move on from the past, get over the diversity of the past, it was engineered and is still being engineered

  • Start local businesses and support one another, stop poverty


GMO the Latest new food born virus called Listeriosis, my bet its also generically weaponized-

Listeriosis is one of the serious food-borne illnesses you can contract from bacteria.

What is Listeriosis?

It is a food poisoning that occurs when the bacteria known as listeria has contaminated a consumable item. The disease is particularly dangerous for the elderly, young babies, and pregnant women.
The bacteria itself thrives in soil and water, so everything from vegetables to the drinking supply, to the grazing animals we consume can carry the disease.

How do you catch Listeriosis?

If you eat foods that have been produced carelessly, you may be ingesting dairy, meats or vegetables that carry the infection. By failing to thoroughly wash your hands or refrigerate these produce before eating, your chances of contracting Listeriosis go up.
If you fail to refrigerate food that needs to be stocked somewhere cold, then you’re playing with fire. Bacteria multiply in warm, dry conditions. Citizens are advised to refrigerate food immediately after buying and not allowing cool foods to stand out in hot conditions.

When did it happen the last time?

The infection is contracted through the bacteria ‘listeria’, which can be found in vegetables as well as meat and dairy products. It thrives in warm, wet conditions and permeates the soil on farm land. Both animals and crops can be carriers of Listeriosis, which finds its way to humans when we consume said products.
To find out how you can avoid the illness, please read the Listeriosis safety guide we put together earlier this month. The outbreak in Mzansi has health officials and ordinary citizens on high alert, just as it did previously.

When was the last time Listeriosis was found in South Africa?

There were seven cases reported between January 2015 – September 2015. All of the cases were non-fatal, and reported at a tertiary hospital in the Western Cape.

When was South Africa’s last outbreak of Listeriosis?

When the disease begins to affect people outside of a certain environment, it becomes known as an ‘outbreak’. The last Listeriosis outbreak to hit South Africa was more than forty years ago.
The infection took hold of 14 people from in and around Johannesburg. A 48-year-old Sowetan male was the first to catch the disease on 3 August 1977.  Then, 13 more cases were recorded over the next nine months. A 28-year-old male was the last person to catch Listeriosis on 15 April 1978.